Zoning Custer and 121 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

City of Frisco Question and Answer Board » Frisco Q & A » Zoning Custer and 121 « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message

A Conaway
New member
Username: Doxiedogs

Post Number: 1
Registered: 11-2009
Posted on Saturday, November 07, 2009 - 06:49 pm:   

We are considering buying a house in Hunters Creek subdivision. There is a strip of land behind this area (near Custer and 121) where a water storage facility is located. It appears there may have been the start of construction as there is a drive with a stone bridge. How is this strip zoned? Per the Zoning map it appears to be zoned for offices, is that correct and is there any current development planned?


Scott Ingalls, Zoning & Subdivision Admi
Username: Scott_ingalls

Post Number: 552
Registered: 06-2003
Posted on Monday, November 09, 2009 - 04:12 pm:   

A Conaway,

I will need a little more information about the site that you are asking about. There is a drive and bridge that connects the water storage facility with Custer Road. This drive runs parallel with the alley behind the homes in Hunters Creek Subdivision. The land that the drive crosses is zoned Commercial-1 which allows a wide range of businesses, stores, offices, and restaurants.

This property is part of a larger tract of land proposed for development. At this time only the lots that face onto Custer Road are being developed. Ultimately the land where the drive is will be developed for commercial purposes. At this time there are no approved plans for the future development of the property.

If this is not the area that you are asking about please respond with more information and I will get you an answer.

Scott Ingalls
Development Coordinator

Add Your Message Here
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message